Relativism

People say That's true for you but not for me or some form of it all the time and it's called relativism.  Most people believe truth is based on the situation or circumstances.  A Barna survey showed that 64% of American adults said truth is "relative to the person and their situation" where 83% of teenagers said "moral truth depends on the circumstances".  6% of those surveyed said moral truth is absolute.  This survey is from 2002 but it probably hasn't changed all that much, if anything the percent believing in relativism has probably increased.

Some examples of statements that reflect relativism are:

"Christianity and the Bible may be true for you but it's not for me." "That's just your interpretation." "Who are you to judge?" "There are lots of paths to God." "Belief in Jesus as the only way to God is intolerant."

Most everyone has heard at least a couple of these.  Is relativism true?  Does relativism even stand up to it's own claim that truth is in the eye of the beholder?  One question can start to point out the problem with relativism and the rejection of absolute truth.

Bob: "Everyone's beliefs are true or false only relative to himself." John: "Is that absolutely true?"

Do you see the problem here? The statement Bob is making is an absolute statement about truth.  If truth is relative to the person why should I even care about Bob's statement because it's not true for me?  Bob is saying that truth is not absolute but yet he's making an absolute statement about it.  It's because in practice relativism doesn't match with reality.  Truth is a belief that matches the way things really are.

Regardless of our own view something can be true even if...

• ...we don't agree with it
• ...we don't practice it
• ...we don't follow it

Moral relativism says that right and wrong are dependent on individual or culture.  The question to ask the moral relativist is: Were Hitler and the Nazis wrong?  There is no basis within relativism to say that it is wrong.  If according to relativism each culture gets to decide their own right and wrong how could Hitler have been wrong?  The culture of Nazism said it was right to murder, rape, torture, and scientifically experiment on Jews.  If the relativist answer is that the rest of world said it was wrong and they stopped it, it's then just a case of might makes right.  The biggest and strongest get to decide what's right and wrong.  So if the Nazis would have prevailed in WWII it would have been ok because they were stronger?  Or would murdering innocent Jews be ok because the Nazis won?  When taken to it's logical conclusion it's clear to see that moral relativism is really just a justification for not following an objective moral standard.

Truth can be known and truth is real.  We don't get to make up our truth because truth is objective and is true no matter if we agree with it or not.  Truth claims should be examined and tested.  Test people's truth claims with gentleness and respect.  Our culture is ripe with relativism and they didn't come to their ideas overnight and won't change their minds with just one conversation.

Resources

True for You, But Not for Me: Overcoming Objections to Christian Faith by Paul Copan

Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions by Gregory Koukl
Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis
On Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and Precision by William Lane Craig

These are just some of the really great books that discuss the problems with relativism.  All the above selections are also available on Kindle.

Free will

Below is an article on a recent book by Vincent Bugliosi titled The Divinity of Doubt. Bugliosi prosecuted Charles Manson and is an atheist.

PleaseConvinceMe Blog: Should God Have Given Us Free Will?

What is the gospel message?

If someone asked you what the gospel message is how would you answer?  Gospel means good news, but what good news is it and why would anyone need to know about it?  How would you explain the gospel message to someone else?  To explain it helps to work through why people to need hear the good news.

What happens when we die?
Almost everyone has thought about the answer to this question.  Some of the more common things people say:

• I'm going to heaven because I've been a good person.
• I don't know.
• I'm going to hell.
• We all go to heaven.
• I'm going to heaven because I believe Jesus died for my sins and was resurrected.
• Nothing.  I don't think anything happens.

If the response is nothing then the question is what happened to Hitler/Stalin/Mao/Saddam?  Did God just let them go unpunished for murdering millions of people?  If the response is that nothing happened to them then there is evidence that can be presented for the existence of God and there are resources listed at the end of the post.  For the other responses that leads to another question.

What determines where we go when we die?
If you were to die today and meet God and He asked you, "Why should I let you into heaven?"  What would you say?  Some people might say they've done more good than bad.  Others might say they've never done anything real bad like murder or rape and they are basically a good person.  But is that really how God measures our entrance into heaven?  God determines our destination based on guilt or innocence not on how good or bad we are.  But guilty or innocent of what?

God gave Moses His laws and the easiest way to show how we are judged is to look at just a few of these laws:

• Do not commit adultery - Jesus said that you've committed adultery if you've even thought about it.  God knows your heart and mind and if you've thought lustfully about someone who isn't your spouse you've committed adultery.
• Do not lie
• Do not steal
• Have no gods before me - This is putting anything on your priority list above God.  Money, sex, work, yourself are all things that people put above God.
• Honor your mother and father
• Do not use God's name in vain - Using God's name as a curse word.

If we're honest with ourselves we've all broken at least one of these and chances are (I know it's the case for me) we've broken every one of them multiple times, probably more times than we can count.  That's God's standard and if we've broken one of these laws even once we're guilty.  God is just and because He is just He can't overlook someone breaking His laws.  It would be unfair of God to forgive us for free.

To illustrate this point suppose someone murdered a member of your family.  You are watching the trial and the murder stands up and says "Yes, I did commit the murder.  However, driving on the way here to the trial a school bus ran off the road into a lake and I jumped in and saved 10 kids from drowning.  Here are signed statements from witnesses.  I've saved more lives than I've taken therefore I've done more good than bad and should be let go."  The judge pounds his gavel and says, "You're free to go."  We'd be irate if this happened and say that justice hadn't been served and the judge was terrible.  Because it doesn't matter how many lives the murder saves there is still a price to pay for the one life that he took.  However, that's exactly what we expect God to do is look the other way when we've broken His laws.

What happens next?
 So if we've broken God's laws what happens when we meet God?  The answer to that should be obvious at this point.  We're judged based on our guilt or innocence (our sin record).  How is any of this 'good news' if we're guilty?

Well, the good news is that God has provided a way for us to be innocent.  He sent is only son, Jesus, to earth who lived a perfect life.  He was tempted just like we are but he never sinned.  He was the only person who ever lived who could stand before God and be judged as innocent.  However, Jesus willing was beaten, spit on, kicked, mocked, and nailed naked to a cross to die a slow agonizing death.  All of the sins of all us were heaped on him and he took our punishment so we wouldn't have to.  Why was this necessary?  Because remember God is just and can't let law breaking go unpunished and Jesus stepped in and took our punishment for us so we wouldn't have to take it.

For us to have what Jesus did on the cross be substituted for our own guilty record and not go to hell we do 2 things: Ask for forgiveness and believe.

• Ask for forgiveness (repent) - You realize you've sinned and broken God's laws, you feel sorrowful, and you confess it to God.
• Believe - You put your trust in Jesus that his dying on the cross was payment for your sin.  His resurrection was proof that He was the Son of God and His death was sufficient to cover your sin.

That is the truly good news of the Christian gospel message.  If people don't understand how they've sinned against God they can't understand or respond to the gospel message.  Understanding why we need the gospel message is as important as understanding the message itself.

Hopefully this will help you communicate the gospel message to others.  Much of this post was based on the book, "Unsilenced: How to Voice the Gospel" by James Boccardo.  It's a quick easy read and is an excellent book on the subject.

If you're reading this and haven't accepted the sacrifice Jesus made would be interested to hear why or what your objections are.

Resources
Unsilenced: How to Voice the Gospel, by James Boccardo
On Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and Percision, by William Craig Lane
The Unshakeable Truth, by Josh McDowell and Sean McDowell

Forgiveness

The act of forgiving or being forgiven is central to the Christian message.  Jesus and Peter had the following exchange on forgiveness:

Then Peter came to him and asked, “Lord, how often should I forgive someone who sins against me? Seven times?”
 “No, not seven times,” Jesus replied, “but seventy times seven!"

Matthew 18:21-22 (NLT)

It was Jewish law and custom to forgive a person 3 times for an offense and after that you were allowed to write them off.  So when Peter asks if he should forgive someone 7 times he was going beyond the Jewish custom.  Jesus answer is that he should forgive them an unlimited number of times.  There is no scoreboard when it comes to forgiveness.

So from the Christian worldview what is forgiveness?  You've probably heard the saying 'forgive and forget' but is the realistic?  If someone deeply hurts you, especially someone close to you, it comes across as extremely insensitive and unreasonable for someone to say 'You need to forgive and forget'.  Forgiveness doesn't mean you automatically start to trust someone again right away either.

Forgiveness is an act of releasing anger and resentment towards someone else.  It gives us the opportunity to move forward and heal.  It allows you to let go and display the same grace you've been given through Jesus.

Links
7 Things Forgiveness IS
7 Things Forgiveness is NOT
8 Reminders for Granting True Forgiveness

The End of the World That Wasn't Reaction

Lots of mileage was given to Harold Camping and his false teaching about the end of the world this past weekend.  His teaching is not Biblical and here are various articles and comments from the Christian community.

The Real Reason Harold Camping Predicted ‘The Rapture’

Harold Camping: Unrepentant False Prophet Refuses to Stop Dragging Christ's Name Through the Mud

When False Prophets Hurt Families

Why We Weren't Worried About May 21

Narrow mindedness

Good article at Stand To Reason on narrow mindedness

Is the Evidence Really All That Convincing?

One of the questions that comes up when discussing the evidence for Christianty is:

If the evidence is so convincing for Christianity why isn't everyone a Christian?

I listened to a podcast the other day at PleaseConvinceMe.com that addressed this question pretty well.  It can also be accessed on iTunes by searching "PleaseConvinceMe Podcast".  It's worth a listen if you've ever had this question.  The discussion starts at about 10:25 and ends at about 30:00.  I'll try to summarize the podcast below.

If there is a God out there why wouldn't he just make everyone a believer?  Just force himself on us so that everyone believes?

In order for people to love God they have to have the freedom to choose to deny God.  You can't love without the ability to choose not to love.  Love is only meaningful if there is choice.  So to force people to love you really isn't love at all.

There is sufficent evidence to believe that God exists and people still deny the evidence.  There are 3 reasons why someone would deny a truth claim.

1. Rational disbelief - This is presented as an intellectual reason for not believing.  They don't believe the evidence is sufficient.
2. Emotinal disbelief - This can be tied to politics, to past painful experiences, or rejection of some person associated with Christianity.
3. Volitional disbelief - This might be largest group of unbelievers.  This is the unwillingness to change life style.  The more likely a change in worldview is to make people change their lives the more likely they won't do it.

People often reject things that are true not because of reason or logic but because of #2 and #3.  With #1 for some people (not all) it won't matter how much evidence is presented because their objection really is because of #2 or #3.  Also not all unbelief for those that fall into #1 is rational.  For instance if the evidence someone needs is to physically see God and see him perform a miracle and after seeing this they need to have a pyscological exam to prove they are of sound mind then that's evidence that I can never provide.

I found the podcast pretty good and maybe you will too.